![]() |
![]() |
RUBRIC FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION |
This may be used for self-assessment and/or peer feedback, as well as for formal assessment. |
| CRITERIA |
EXEMPLARY
|
PROFICIENT (3 points) |
EMERGING
(2 points) |
INCOMPLETE (1 point) |
RAW PTS. | WEIGHTING and TOTAL |
Research and Notetaking |
Notes indicate accurately researched and varied information from a wide variety of sources Relevant information recorded Neatly organised and clearly labelled notes |
Notes indicate accurately researched and varied information from several sources; Mostly relevant information recorded Neat notes and reasonable organisation |
Some attempt to acquire information relevant to topic, but from few sources Notes reveal some organisation |
Few notes reveal little attempt to acquire information Notes (if presented) are unorganised and incomplete |
x = | |
Storyboard or Planning Sheet |
Illustrates the slideshow structure with thumbnail sketches of each slide, clearly identifying title and text of each slide; Layout is clearly delineated (font, background, graphics, hyperlinks, sound) |
Illustrates the slideshow structure with thumbnail sketches, generally identifying purpose, sequential order and a broad indication of layout (font, background, graphics, hyperlinks, sound) |
The thumbnail sketches on the storyboard are mostly in logical sequence and have some information about layout |
There are very few thumbnail sketches on the storyboard Thumbnail sketches do not provide an overview of the presentation |
||
Subject Knowledge |
Subject knowledge is clearly evident throughout the presentation All information is clear, appropriate and accurate |
Subject knowledge is evident in most of the presentation Most information is clear, appropriate and accurate |
Some subject knowledge is evident in the presentation |
Subject knowledge is not evident Information is confusing, incorrect or flawed, or too insufficient to judge |
||
Organisation |
The sequence of information is logical and well-organised Reveals very clear outline, introduction, body and conclusion |
The sequence of information is quite well-organised Mostly clear outline, introduction, body and conclusion |
Parts of the sequence of information are organised Some attempt at outline, introduction, body and conclusion |
The sequence of information is dis-organised Outline, introduction, body and conclusion are confused or unclear |
||
| Referencing/ Bibliography
|
All sources of information are properly acknowledged in the text All sources of information a clearly identified in the Bibliography using the school's preferred style |
Sources are mainly acknowledged in the text Most sources are identified in the Bibliography, using the school's preferred style |
Some sources of information are acknowledged in the text Some sources are identified in the Bibliography |
Sources of information were not acknowledged or identified either in the text or in the Bibliography |
||
Technical Aspects |
Presentation of required number of slides runs very smoothly Slide transitions and animations are very consistent, and timing and order of appearance enhance the presentation |
Presentation of required number of slides runs smoothly Slide transitions and animations are consistent, subtle, and well-timed |
Presentation runs quite smoothly and features nearly the required no. of slides Animations and transitions are mostly consistent and suitable |
Presentation doesn't feature required number of slides Slide transitions and animations are not consistent Timing is confused/distracting |
||
Layout |
Layout is exceptionally creative and visually appealing, appropriate to the message, and uses headings, sub-headings and white space very well Fonts, colour and background are all in harmony and provide a consistent theme and easy readability |
Layout is creative and visually appealing, appropriate to the message, and uses headings, sub-headings and white space well Fonts, colour and background are almost all in harmony, and provide a clear theme and easy readability |
Layout quite visually appealing/appropriate to the message, although headings and sub-headings are not always logical, and white space is sometimes too cluttered/ too empty Fonts, colour and background are mostly in harmony and easy to read |
Layout lacks visual appeal and is sometimes unstructured, or confusing, while white space is not used effectively (too cluttered/empty) Fonts, colour and background lack harmony and text is not easy to read |
||
| Effects (Graphics , Sound/Video) | All graphics, sound/video or other enhancements are used effectively to enrich the presentation Enhancements contribute significantly to convey the intended meaning |
Most graphics, sound/ video or other enhancements are used appropriately to enrich the presentation Enhancements contribute in conveying the intended meaning |
Some use of graphics, sound/ video or other enhancements, but they do not always enrich presentation Enhancements are mostly appropriate, relevant and restrained |
Very few, if any, graphic, sound/ video or other effects are present, or use of these tools is inappropriate, irrelevant or excessive | ||
| Writing Mechanics | The text is clearly written, with no spelling, grammar or punctuation errors to detract from content | The text is clearly written, with few errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation to detract from content | Content is understandable, but spelling, grammar and punctuation occasionally detract from content | Many spelling and/or punctuation errors seriously hinder the communication of content | ||
| Presentation | Excellent integration of spoken and visual presentation Very confident and compelling delivery features frequent eye contact, good diction and limited use of notes Well rehearsed |
Integrates spoken and visual presentation well Confident and capable delivery features good eye contact, clear diction and restricted use of notes Quite well- rehearsed |
Attempts to integrate spoken and visual presentation Delivery includes some eye contact, reasonable diction and some reliance on notes Some evidence of rehearsal |
Spoken and visual presentation is difficult to follow and understand Delivery features little eye contact and/or poor diction with an over-reliance on notes Little evidence of rehearsal |
[ Back to St Margaret's AGS Home Page | Back to Information Centre Home Page ]
Copyright St Margaret's AGS 2005
Page created by Jennifer King. Last edited 17 April 2005